No, This Lady Was Selling Actual Lady Scout Cookies Outside of Urbn Leaf

The nation remains in an outcry! Many praise the resourcefulness that allowed a girl in southern California to offer many lady scout cookies, others are outraged about the message that a child selling cookies outside a potshop could send. In either case, it occurred and the debate is on!

The Lady Scout Cookies strain of cannabis was required to rename itself GSC, however the idea needs to have been the same. Who doesn’t prefer to eat girl scout cookies when they have the munchies?

The girl, who has actually not been publicly identified, offered more than 300 boxes in 6 hours, her father informed ABC 10. Boxes now cost as much as $5 in parts of the nation, so she probably raised more than $1,500. Yes, there’s cash in the munchies.

While some have praised the adventurous scout for finding out where the need would most likely be, the Woman Scouts organization has actually been wrestling with how to deal with marijuana-adjacent sales as more states have legislated the drug.

Women who wheel carts filled with cookies are normally complimentary to take a trip where they please with their moms and dads, even if that course takes them past marijuana shops, however there are often more stringent rules around where to set up booths or stands. There are no nationwide policies associated with cannabis dispensaries. Each regional organization sets its own policies.

“This is type of a community issue,” said Mike Lopes, a representative for the Woman Scouts of the U.S.A. “For the many part, it’s not any various than offering in front of other type of shop. It simply occurs to be a cannabis dispensary.”

It’s not the very first time that woman scout cookies were offered beyond a marijuana dispensary. It happened in San Francisco and in Portland, Oregon. This time, the outrage has actually gone to another level though. Do you believe that the woman was revealing clever salesmanship by establishing outside Urbn Leaf, or do you think it sends a bad message to children?

find out more at nytimes.com

Leave a Reply