Might the Mexican Supreme Court Legalize Marijuana Nationally Quickly
A lot has actually been occurring on the political front here in The United States and Canada between Canada and the United States. But, something is occurring south of the border in Mexico that may be falling under the radar for a great deal of people. While the Mexican presidential election is turning up soon, it is in fact the fact that the Supreme Court is currently attempting to determine whether the restriction of marijuana in Mexico is a human rights violation.
In Mexico, the Supreme Court can enact laws by its decisions on its own, but they must rule on a problem five times in a row in the same method in order for the law to pass. An attorney, Ulrich Richter, is taking legal action against the Mexican government saying that the prohibition of marijuana is affecting the totally free development of his personality.
The first chamber of the court starts on April 11th, 2018, and they will go over the case of legal representative Ulrich Richter. Richter is arguing that the restriction of marijuana breaches a person’s human right to the “totally free development of character.” His argument is supported by Supreme Court Judge, Jorge Mario Pardo, who has actually embarked on a task that believes the exact same thing: that absolute marijuana restriction is extreme and breaches human rights.
Mexican law is different than American law. Unlike in the U.S. where the Supreme Court only needs to rule on something when for it end up being law, in Mexico, the Supreme Court needs to release the same judgment five times in order to enact modification.
Richter isn’t really the first individual to bring this case to the Mexican Supreme Court. In truth, it’s not even the very first time he’s personally tried to discuss this concern in the Court. He attempted this time in 2015 and was turned down. But this year, after Mexico just recently passed medical marijuana and enjoyed its northern next-door neighbor, California, fully legalize the herb, the tide is changing.
It is not unreasonable to argue that a person ought to have the ability to do anything they want with themselves, otherwise they are having their natural rights removed from them. Do you see the prohibition of marijuana as something that strips you of your natural rights?